Inter-Asia Research Networks̶. “Prince and Priest: Mpu Tantular’s Two Works in the Fourteenth Century Majapahit.” Memoirs of the Research De-partment of the Toyo Bunko 56 (1999): 63–83.Brandes, J. L. A., ed. and trans. Pararaton (Ken Arok) of het boek der koningen van Tumapeˇl en van Majapahit. 2nd ed. Ed. by N. J. Krom. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1920.Coedès, G. The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. Trans. by Susan Brown Cowing, Ed. by Walter F. Vella. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii, 1968.Hall, Kenneth R. Maritime Trade and State Development in Early Southeast Asia. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin, 1985.Krom, N. J. Hindoe-Javaansche geschiedenis. 2nd ed. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1931.Kulke, Hermann. Kings and Cults: State Formation and Legitimation in India and Southeast Asia. Delhi: Manohari, 2001.Pigeaud, Theodore G. Th. Java in the 14th Century: A Study in Cultural History. 5 vols. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960–1963.Reid, Anthony and David Marr, eds. Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Heinemann Educational Books, 1979.Ricklefs, M. C., ed. A New History of Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Roboson, Stuart, trans. Des´awarn.ana: NΣgarakr.t.Σgama. Leiden: KITLV Press, 1995.Van Naerssen, F. H. and R. C. de Iongh. The Economic and Administrative History of Early Indonesia. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1977.Wolters, O. W. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Rev. ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Southeast Asia Program Publications, 1999.Zoetmulder, P. J. Kalangwan: A Survey of Old Javanese Literature. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.Sanskritized Imperialism and State Integration in Early Medieval North India (c. 950–200)MITA Masahiko(Research Fellow, Toyo Bunko; Assistant Professor, Graduate School of Letters, Nagoya University)Recent historiographies often describe the history of the post-Gupta and early medieval periods as the process of regional state formation by looking at the historical changes in local societies [Chattopadhyaya 2012; Kulke 1993; Kapur 2002; Sheikh 2010; Lieberman 2009]. However, those regional states which gained independence from the declining imperial powers in the 10th century, namely the Prat∏hΣras, PΣlas, and RΣs.t.rakπ, did not consider unifying the regions as their political goals, and neither did they adopt the vernaculars (des´∏) as their official languages; rather, they adopted Sanskrit, and often aimed at conquering the whole world, which often means the whole India (BhΣratavars.a), as their ultimate purpose, just as the former imperial powers did. In the Dharmas´Σstras, PurΣ, the Epics, and other Sanskrit texts of Brahmanism in this period, ideal kings are depicted as a samrΣj or cakravartin who subjugates all the kings of the world. The aforementioned ultimate purpose of the so-called regional states of this period was apparently based on this kind of ideology, a ‘Sanskritized imperialism’, so to speak. This paper tries to clarify the political meanings of their declaration of being world conquerors (samrΣj or cakravartin) in the Sanskrit ecumene of the 10th to 12th centuries by investigating the narrative on legitimized kingship recorded in the Figure Delhi-Topra Inscription of Vigraha rΣja IV of the CΣhamΣnas, Dated VS 1220, Which Is Engraved in NΣgar∏ on the Lower Part of the Pillar, While the Upper Inscription Is the Edicts of As´oka.091